Category Archives: Papers

Bei Bedarf, beim Bäcker … (Praxis Deutsch)

Sayatz, Ulrike & Schäfer, Roland (2023) „Bei Bedarf, beim Bäcker, bei seiner großen Liebe – Versteckte Kasus sichtbar machen“, Praxis Deutsch 302.

Abstract

Die Schüler:innen entwickeln ein Bewusstsein für die Kasusrektion von Präpositionen. In Präpo­ sitionalphrasen mit kasusunmarkiertem Substantiv spüren sie „versteckte“ Kasus auf, indem sie Artikel oder attributive Adjektive einfügen und so Träger von Kasusmarkierungen identifizieren.

BibTeX entry

@article{SayatzSchaefer2023,
author = {Ulrike Sayatz and Roland Sch{\"a}fer},
title = {Bei {B}edarf, beim {B}äcker, bei seiner großen {L}iebe -- {V}ersteckte {K}asus sichtbar machen},
journal = {Praxis Deutsch},
volume = {302},
year = {2023}
}

Towards a treatment of register phenomena in HPSG (Proc. HPSG)

Machicao y Priemer, Antonio and Müller, Stefan, Schäfer, Roland & Bildhauer, Felix (2023) “Towards a treatment of register phenomena in {HPSG}”, Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2022.5

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with register-driven variation from a probabilistic perspective, as proposed in Schäfer, Bildhauer, Reiß, Pankratz, Müller (in prep.). We compare two approaches to analyse this variation within HPSG. On the one hand, we consider a multiple-grammar approach and combine it with the architecture proposed in the CoreGram project Müller (2015) – discussing its advantages and disadvantages. On the other hand, we take into account a single-grammar approach and argue that it appears to be superior due to its computational efficiency and cognitive plausibility.

Funding

This paper was partly funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – SFB 1412, 416591334, Project A04.

BibTeX entry

@inproceedings{MachicaoypriemerEa2023,
author = Antonio {Machicao y Priemer} and Stefan Müller and Roland Schäfer and Felix Bildhauer},
title = {Towards a treatment of register phenomena in {HPSG},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the {29th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar}, {Nagoya University \& Institute for Japanese Language and Linguistics}},
address = {Frankfurt/Main},
date = {2022},
doi = {10.21248/hpsg.2022.5},
pages = {86--101},
publisher = {University Library}
}

 

Situating language register … (Frontiers)

Pescuma, Valentina N. & Serova, Dina & Lukassek, Julia & Sauermann, Antje & Schäfer, Roland & Adli, Aria & Bildhauer, Felix & Egg, Markus & Hülk, Kristina & Ito, Aine & Jannedy, Stefanie & Kordoni, Valia & Kühnast, Milena & Kutscher, Silvia & Lange, Robert & Lehmann, Nico & Liu, Mingya & Lütke, Beate & Maquate, Katja & Mooshammer, Christine & Mortezapour, Vahid & Müller, Stefan & Norde, Muriel & Pankratz, Elizabeth & Patarroyo, Angela G. & Pleșca, Ana-Maria & Ronderos, Camilo R. & Rotter, Stephanie & Sauerland, Uli & Schnelle, Gohar & Schulte, Britta & Schüppenhauer, Gediminas & Sell, Bianca Maria & Solt, Stephanie & Terada, Megumi & Tsiapou, Dimitra & Verhoeven, Elisabeth & Weirich, Melanie & Wiese, Heike & Zaruba, Kathy & Zeige, Lars Erik & Lüdeling, Anke & Knoeferle, Pia (2022) “Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, & cultural aspects: Evidence from complementary methods”, Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964658

Abstract

In the present review paper by members of the collaborative research center “Register: Language Users’ Knowledge of Situational-Functional Variation” (CRC 1412), we assess the pervasiveness of register phenomena across different time periods, languages, modalities, and cultures. We define “register” as recurring variation in language use depending on the function of language and on the social situation. Informed by rich data, we aim to better understand and model the knowledge involved in situation- and function-based use of language register. In order to achieve this goal, we are using complementary methods and measures. In the review, we start by clarifying the concept of “register”, by reviewing the state of the art, and by setting out our methods and modeling goals. Against this background, we discuss three key challenges, two at the methodological level and one at the theoretical level: (1) To better uncover registers in text and spoken corpora, we propose changes to established analytical approaches. (2) To tease apart between-subject variability from the linguistic variability at issue (intra-individual situation-based register variability), we use within-subject designs and the modeling of individuals’ social, language, and educational background. (3) We highlight a gap in cognitive modeling, viz. modeling the mental representations of register (processing), and present our first attempts at filling this gap. We argue that the targeted use of multiple complementary methods and measures supports investigating the pervasiveness of register phenomena and yields comprehensive insights into the cross-methodological robustness of register-related language variability. These comprehensive insights in turn provide a solid foundation for associated cognitive modeling.

Funding

This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)—SFB 1412, 416591334.

BibTeX entry

@article{PescumaEs2023,
author = {Pescuma, Valentina N. and Serova, Dina and Lukassek, Julia and Sauermann, Antje and Sch{\"a}fer, Roland and Adli, Aria and Bildhauer, Felix and Egg, Markus and H{\"u}lk, Kristina and Ito, Aine and Jannedy, Stefanie and Kordoni, Valia and K{\"u}hnast, Milena and Kutscher, Silvia and Lange, Robert and Lehmann, Nico and Liu, Mingya and L{\"u}tke, Beate and Maquate, Katja and Mooshammer, Christine and Mortezapour, Vahid and family=M{\"u}ller, given=Stefan, given-i={St.} and Norde, Muriel and Pankratz, Elizabeth and Patarroyo, Angela G. and Pleșca, Ana-Maria and Ronderos, Camilo R. and Rotter, Stephanie and Sauerland, Uli and Schnelle, Gohar and Schulte, Britta and Sch{\"u}ppenhauer, Gediminas and Sell, Bianca Maria and Solt, Stephanie and Terada, Megumi and Tsiapou, Dimitra and Verhoeven, Elisabeth and Weirich, Melanie and Wiese, Heike and Zaruba, Kathy and Zeige, Lars Erik and L{\"u}deling, Anke and Knoeferle, Pia},
title = {Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, and cultural aspects: {Evidence} from complementary methods},
date = {2023},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964658},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
pages = {1--31},
publisher = {Frontiers},
volume = {13},
}

Between syntax and morphology (Glossa)

Schäfer, Roland & Sayatz, Ulrike (2024) “Between syntax and morphology: German noun+verb units”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 9(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10069

Abstract

We show that graphemic variation—at least in some writing systems—can be analysed in terms of grammatical variation given a usage- based probabilistic view of the grammar-graphemics interface. Concretely, we examine a type of noun+verb unit in German, which can be written as one word or two. We argue that the variation in writing is rooted in the units’ ambiguous status in between morphology (one word) and syntax (two words). The major influencing factors are shown to be the semantic relation between the noun and the verb (argument or oblique relation) and the morphosyntactic context. In prototypically nominal contexts, a reinterpretation of the unit as a noun+noun compound is facilitated, which favours spelling as one word, while in prototypically verbal contexts, a syntactic realisation and consequently spelling as two words is preferred. We report the results of two large-scale corpus studies and a controlled production experiment to corroborate our analysis.

Funding

Roland Schäfer’s work on this paper was funded in part by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) – SFB 1412, 416591334.

BibTeX entry

@article{SchaeferSayatz2024,
  author = {Roland Schäfer and Ulrike Sayatz},
  journal = {Glossa},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-36},
  title = {Between syntax and morphology: {German} noun+verb units},
  volume = {9},
  year = {2024}}

The plural interpretability of German linking elements (Schäfer & Pankratz 2018)

Roland Schäfer & Elizabeth Pankratz (2018) The plural interpretability of German linking elements. Morphology 28(4), 325–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-018-9331-5 (Click the title for online reading, click the DOI for official bibliographic information.) [BibTeX]

Continue reading